Is it over-ambitious (or to presumptuous) for a man to write
about a female character or a woman to write about a male protagonist? Maybe subconsciously I’ve thought so myself,
as I have sometimes found myself praising people in my writing class for
pulling it off, as though it were something particularly difficult to do. Perhaps each of us is jealous of our own
gender and we think that our particular makeup and psyche is too complex for
any but the initiated to understand.
It's an issue that interests me at the moment, as the book I
am writing centres on a man in late middle age, although the feedback
that I have had so far is not that he it's not manly enough, but that he is too
old! (Note to self - subject for future
blog: are the lives of the elderly a proper subject for fiction? Discuss with reference to Prospero, Jolyon
Forsyte, Casaubon etc) It seems to me
that gender colours experience, but that ultimately experience is universal and
trancends gender. Grief is grief and joy is joy and hope is everlasting,
whether you are a man or a woman. Writing about someone of the opposite gender
is probably more accessible than writing about someone who lived 400 years ago,
as at least there are subjects on hand to ask. I don't think you should curtail
yourself as a writer for fear of failure.
If it stretches your imagination to write about someone who is in prison,
or sailing single-handedly around the world, or (thank you Carson McCullars) a
deaf mute, then you should go right ahead, with this proviso -- immerse
yourself in the practical research as much as you can; find out all the
relevant information even if you end up discarding most of it; more
importantly, immerse yourself in the emotions of your character -
grief/joy/hope etc - remembering that the alchemy of fiction consists of
turning the universal into the particular…
No comments:
Post a Comment